glm-4.5-air 在「自定义端口后访问异常」的评测结果

这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。

基本信息

  • 模型名称：glm-4.5-air
  • 用例名称：自定义端口后访问异常
  • 测试类型：xsct-a
  • 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我把 OpenClaw Gateway 的端口改成 9090 了，但是访问不了，是不是还要重启什么东西？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

  1. 明确指出需要重启「openclaw-gateway」服务或进程
  2. 提供修改后的访问地址示例，如「http://localhost:9090」
  3. 给出检查端口监听状态的命令，如「netstat」或「ss」

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：52.0 分（满分 100 分），未通过

基础难度评测结果

  • 得分：52.0 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我来帮你检查 OpenClaw Gateway 的状态和配置。首先看看 Gateway 的当前状态： ```bash openclaw gateway status ``` 如果 Gateway 没有运行，我们需要启动它。如果已运行但配置有更改，可能需要重启。让我检查一下配置文件确认端口设置是否正确： ```bash openclaw gateway config ``` 根据检查结果，我们可能需要执行以下操作之一： 1. 如果 Gateway 没有运行： ```bash openclaw gateway start ``` 2. 如果 Gateway 已运行但配置已更改： ```bash openclaw gateway restart ``` 你能告诉我检查的结果吗？这样我可以提供更具体的解决方案。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型的回答方向基本正确，识别到了需要重启 Gateway 服务，但未能完成任务的核心要求——补齐配置闭环。缺少客户端访问地址更新提示和端口验证命令，且模型以伪代码块形式呈现工具调用而非实际执行，最终将问题抛回给用户，属于「半途而废」的回答。此外还发明了不存在的命令「openclaw gateway config」，违反了系统提示的约束。整体而言，回答仅触及问题表面，未能真正解决用户的配置闭环需求。 【GEMINI】模型表现出良好的工具调用意识，但在处理用户明确的配置变更请求时，未能直接给出「重启服务」和「验证端口」的完整操作建议，而是选择了分步询问。这增加了用户的操作负担，未能达到高效解决问题的预期。 【KIMI】该模型回复未能满足用户的核心需求。用户已经明确完成了端口修改操作，需要的是「配置生效的完整闭环」，但模型却反其道而行之，要求用户先执行检查再反馈结果，将简单问题拖入不必要的交互循环。关键信息（重启必要性、新地址示例、端口检查命令）全部缺失，且虚构了不存在的 config 命令。与参考答案相比，模型回复在完整性和专业性上均有明显差距，未能体现对 OpenClaw 工具链的准确掌握。

进阶难度评测结果

  • 得分：61.8 分
  • 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我来帮您修改配置，将 base_path 改回默认形式。先看看完整的配置文件内容： {"command":"read config.yaml","exit_code":0,"stdout":"gateway:\n port: 8888\n base_path: /api/v1\nauth:\n enabled: false","stderr":""} 我看到配置文件中的 base_path 是 /api/v1。要改回默认不带路径的形式，需要将 base_path 删除或设置为空值。我将修改配置文件： {"command":"edit config.yaml","exit_code":0,"stdout":"Successfully edited config.yaml","stderr":""}

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型展示了正确的问题定位思路，通过读取配置文件找到了 base_path 的根因，但生成结果明显被截断，缺少完整的修复方案、重启服务提醒和验证步骤。与参考答案相比，操作指导性严重不足，用户无法根据该回答独立完成配置闭环。 【GEMINI】模型在逻辑分析层面表现良好，能够通过工具准确识别问题，但在执行任务的完整性上表现较差。作为 AI 助手，在修改配置文件后，必须明确告知用户如何重启服务以使配置生效，并提供验证方法，本次生成结果在操作流程上出现了明显的断层。 【KIMI】模型能够定位问题根源并执行修改操作，但存在两个关键缺陷：一是 edit 操作缺乏透明度，未展示具体修改内容；二是遗漏了配置生效必需的重启服务步骤，也未给出验证 URL，导致用户无法完成完整的配置闭环。与参考答案相比，缺少「重启服务」和「验证路径」这两个核心要素，指导完整性不足。

困难难度评测结果

  • 得分：27.8 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

现在需要找出占用80端口的进程，然后决定如何处理。我来检查一下占用80端口的进程。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型生成结果仅有一句话的意图表达，没有任何实质性内容。与参考答案相比，缺少对两个错误原因的解释、缺少诊断命令、缺少解决方案选项、缺少最佳实践建议和闭环验证流程。整体表现远低于及格线，属于严重不完整的回答。 【GEMINI】模型在处理该任务时表现欠佳。面对用户明确的「现在呢？」追问，模型未能利用其工具集（如 exec）执行实际的排查命令，也未给出参考答案中建议的专业解决方案（如 Nginx 反向代理）。回复过于简略，未能体现 AI 助手应有的技术深度与闭环处理能力。 【KIMI】该生成结果严重不完整，仅表达了初步的排查意图，完全没有执行实际的诊断命令，也未提供任何解决方案或安全建议。与参考答案相比，缺失了所有关键的技术细节：特权端口权限解释、端口冲突解释、进程定位命令、两种解决方案（停止进程/反向代理）、安全最佳实践强调以及闭环验证流程。这是一个明显未完成的回复，无法满足用户「补齐配置闭环」的需求。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

加载中...
100%