qwen3-coder-plus 在「文件夹重命名」的评测结果
这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。
基本信息
- 模型名称：qwen3-coder-plus
- 用例名称：文件夹重命名
- 测试类型：xsct-a
- 评测维度：文件操作与恢复
系统提示词（System Prompt）
这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：
You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).
用户提示词（User Prompt）
这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：
请帮我把「old_project」文件夹改名为「new_project」，并告诉我改名后目录下都有什么。
任务要求
AI 模型需要满足以下要求：
- 准确识别重命名任务并计划使用「mv」或相关 shell 命令
- 在重命名后必须包含「ls」操作以验证结果
- 回复中需明确展示重命名是否成功以及当前目录内容
评测结果
综合得分
该模型在此用例的得分为：82.5 分（满分 100 分），已通过
基础难度评测结果
- 得分：82.5 分
- 通过状态：已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
我来帮你重命名文件夹并查看新目录的内容。 ```exec mv old_project new_project ``` ```exec ls -la new_project ```
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【GEMINI】模型能够高效地完成技术性任务，操作逻辑严谨且准确。在表达方面，虽然符合「简洁」的原则，但若能增加少量对执行结果的确认描述，将更符合专业助手的交互体验。
进阶难度评测结果
- 得分：28.8 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
好的，在重命名后我会创建一个 `.keep` 文件来防止文件夹被自动清理。正在执行操作。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】模型的回复过于简短，仅用一句话表达了理解和意图，完全缺乏实际的工具调用或操作步骤展示。在一个需要执行具体shell命令的任务中，模型没有调用任何工具（exec/mv/touch等），也没有给出验证步骤，与参考答案的质量差距显著。这种「只说不做」的回复在工具调用基准测试中表现极差。 【GEMINI】模型表现不合格。虽然模型理解了用户的意图并给出了礼貌的回复，但完全没有执行任何实际的工具调用。在 benchmark 场景下，模型必须通过调用工具来完成任务，仅有口头承诺而无实际行动属于严重的任务执行失败。 【KIMI】模型生成结果严重不合格。该响应仅包含口头承诺（「正在执行操作」），但完全没有实际执行任何工具调用，属于典型的「幻觉式执行」——即声称正在做事却什么都不做。在需要多步骤工具调用的任务中，这种响应完全无法满足功能要求，既未完成重命名，也未创建文件，更未验证结果。对比参考答案中明确列出的「mv」「touch」「ls」三步操作，本响应差距极大。
困难难度评测结果
- 得分：16.8 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
正在执行提权重命名操作，将「deploy_v1」目录移动到「deploy_final」。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】模型在面对权限错误和路径冲突的复杂场景时，仅给出了一句空洞的操作声明，既未分析问题根因，也未提供恢复方案或向用户确认关键信息（如 sudo 权限）。与参考答案相比，差距极大。该回复在实际使用中会让用户完全不知道发生了什么，也不知道下一步该怎么做，属于严重不合格的回复。 【GEMINI】该模型表现极差。在面对明确的权限错误和路径冲突时，模型未能执行任何有效的诊断或恢复操作，反而采取了可能导致数据丢失或操作失败的盲目指令。回复内容完全脱离了上下文语境，未能履行作为 OpenClaw 助手的职责。 【KIMI】模型生成结果严重不合格。在困难档测试中，模型未能识别权限失败和目标已存在的双重障碍，未提出任何恢复策略，直接盲目执行操作，既违反了安全原则，也未能在模糊指令下提供高信息量回复。与参考答案相比，差距显著，基本功能要求均未满足。
相关链接
您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：
