glm-5-turbo 在「onboard 权限报错」的评测结果
这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。
基本信息
- 模型名称:glm-5-turbo
- 用例名称:onboard 权限报错
- 测试类型:xsct-a
- 评测维度:Gateway 配置与管理
系统提示词(System Prompt)
这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令:
You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).
用户提示词(User Prompt)
这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求:
我在执行「openclaw onboard」时,终端提示「EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/usr/local/lib/openclaw'」,我该怎么办?
任务要求
AI 模型需要满足以下要求:
- 准确识别报错原因为「目录写入权限不足」
- 提供使用「sudo」提升权限的解决方案
- 建议检查当前用户对目标路径的「所有权」
- 说明 onboard 命令在初始化过程中的作用
评测结果
综合得分
该模型在此用例的得分为:86.2 分(满分 100 分),已通过
基础难度评测结果
- 得分:86.2 分
- 通过状态:已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容:
这是典型的文件系统权限问题——`/usr/local/lib/` 需要 root 权限才能写入。 **最直接的解决办法:加 `sudo`** ```bash sudo openclaw onboard ``` --- **如果你不想用 sudo(比如在无 root 权限的环境中):** 可以通过设置环境变量把安装路径改到用户目录下: ```bash # 例如安装到 ~/.local export OPENCLAW_PREFIX="$HOME/.local" openclaw onboard ``` 安装完后确保 `~/.local/bin` 在你的 `$PATH` 中: ```bash export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH" ``` --- **排查清单:** | 情况 | 建议 | |---|---| | 你是机器管理员 | 直接 `sudo openclaw onboard` | | 你是非 root 用户 | 用 `OPENCLAW_PREFIX` 指向可写目录 | | `/usr/local/lib` 有特殊 ACL/只读挂载 | 检查 `mount \| grep /usr/local` 和 `ls -la /usr/local/lib` | | 用了容器/沙箱环境 | 确保容器以特权模式运行或改用用户路径 | 绝大多数情况下,`sudo openclaw onboard` 就能解决。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评:
【CLAUDE】候选输出整体质量较高,诊断准确、结构清晰,提供了实用的多方案解决路径,并附有排查清单,超出了参考答案的信息量。主要不足是:未说明 onboard 命令的初始化作用,未提供 chown 修改所有权的方案,且 OPENCLAW_PREFIX 环境变量的有效性未经文档验证。总体而言是一个实用、安全、超出基础要求的回答。 【GEMINI】模型对问题的诊断非常准确,提供的解决方案既包含直接的「sudo」修复,也考虑到了非 root 用户的最佳实践(修改安装路径),具有很高的实用价值。虽然未完全覆盖参考答案中提到的「chown」建议,但其提供的环境变量方案在生产环境中更为推荐,整体表现优秀。 【KIMI】候选输出整体质量较高,准确诊断了权限问题并提供了多种解决方案,覆盖场景比参考答案更广。主要不足在于:未完全覆盖评分维度中要求的「检查所有权」和「说明 onboard 作用」两个要点,且安全建议的完整性略逊于参考答案。建议在技术准确性上保持优势的同时,更严格对齐评分维度的具体要求。
进阶难度评测结果
- 得分:77.5 分
- 通过状态:已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容:
问题很明确:日志目录 `/var/log/openclaw` 属于 root,你的普通用户没有写入权限。修复方法如下: ```bash sudo chown -R $(whoami):$(whoami) /var/log/openclaw ``` 这会把目录所有权改为你的当前用户。运行后再重新执行: ```bash openclaw onboard ``` 如果你希望保留 root 所有权但允许所有用户写入(多用户场景),也可以用: ```bash sudo chmod 777 /var/log/openclaw ``` 不过第一种方案更安全,推荐优先使用。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评:
【CLAUDE】候选输出在逻辑推导和核心修复方案上表现良好,准确识别了权限问题并给出了实用的修复指令,还提供了备选方案及安全建议,体现了较高的技术水准。但在方案完整性上存在明显短板:缺少修复后的状态验证步骤、未解释日志记录的重要性、未引导后续认证配置,导致整体闭环不够完整,与参考答案相比存在一定差距。 【GEMINI】模型能够快速定位权限问题并给出有效的修复指令,但在任务要求的完整性方面有所欠缺,未能涵盖对日志重要性的说明及后续配置流程的引导。 【KIMI】模型准确诊断了 EACCES 权限问题的根源并给出了有效的修复命令,技术判断正确。但相比参考答案,缺失了验证修复结果、说明日志重要性以及引导后续认证配置等关键步骤,方案完整性不足,未能形成完整的诊断-修复-验证-引导闭环。
困难难度评测结果
- 得分:44.5 分
- 通过状态:未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容:
onboard 已经搞定了,Gateway 配置在 `~/.openclaw/config.yaml`。 你接下来想做什么?我没有看到更上层的任务上下文,需要你告诉我下一步的方向。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评:
【CLAUDE】候选输出在当前对话节点(用户问「现在呢?」)的回复质量较差。它仅确认了 onboard 完成的事实,但完全没有提供参考答案所要求的关键后续指引:设置 OPENCLAW_CONFIG 环境变量以持久化非默认配置路径、建议启动 Gateway 服务、以及说明后续可配置 Channel 等。候选模型将责任推给用户(「需要你告诉我下一步的方向」),而参考答案则主动给出了明确的下一步操作建议,体现了更好的用户引导能力。整体表现不及格。 【GEMINI】模型在解决问题的执行层面表现出色,成功绕过了权限限制并完成了初始化。但在交互引导上略显被动,未能主动告知用户如何通过环境变量实现配置的持久化,导致用户体验不够闭环。相比参考答案,模型在提供后续操作建议方面有待提升。 【KIMI】候选输出未能满足该 hard 难度任务的核心要求。虽然对话上下文中 onboard 已成功执行,但模型面对「现在呢?」的追问时,完全没有提供关于环境变量设置、服务启动指导等关键后续步骤,也未体现对 OpenClaw 配置机制的深入理解。相比参考答案的全面性,候选输出过于简略且被动,未能形成完整的解决方案闭环。
相关链接
您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容: