Claude Opus 4.6 在「端口冲突改端口」的评测结果
这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。
基本信息
- 模型名称：Claude Opus 4.6
- 用例名称：端口冲突改端口
- 测试类型：xsct-a
- 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理
系统提示词（System Prompt）
这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：
You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).
用户提示词（User Prompt）
这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：
我的 OpenClaw Gateway 默认端口「8080」被其他服务占用了，我该如何修改端口为「9090」并启动服务？
任务要求
AI 模型需要满足以下要求：
- 指出需要修改的配置文件路径「/etc/openclaw/gateway.yaml」
- 明确说明需要修改的配置项名称，如「port」或「server.port」
- 给出修改后的启动命令或重启服务的操作建议
- 提示修改端口后，后续 API 调用或 Web 访问地址需同步变更
评测结果
综合得分
该模型在此用例的得分为：75.75 分（满分 100 分），已通过
基础难度评测结果
- 得分：75.75 分
- 通过状态：已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
# 修改 OpenClaw Gateway 端口并启动服务 让我先查看当前 Gateway 的配置情况。 {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway status 2>&1 || true"}} Let me check the gateway status and configuration. {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "find / -maxdepth 4 -name '*.yaml' -o -name '*.yml' -o -name '*.toml' -o -name '*.conf' 2>/dev/null | grep -i -E '(openclaw|gateway)' | head -20"}} {"name": "ls", "arguments": {"path": "."}} Let me look for the OpenClaw configuration file in common locations. {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "ls -la ~/.openclaw/ 2>/dev/null; ls -la /etc/openclaw/ 2>/dev/null; ls -la ~/.config/openclaw/ 2>/dev/null"}} {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw gateway --help 2>&1 || true"}} {"name": "exec", "arguments": {"command": "openclaw --help 2>&1 || true"}} Based on the available information, here's how to modify the Gateway 端口并启动服务： --- ## 步骤一：修改配置文件 找到 OpenClaw Gateway 的配置文件（通常位于 `~/.openclaw/gateway.yaml` 或 `/etc/openclaw/gateway.yaml`），将端口从 `8080` 改为 `9090`： ```yaml gateway: port: 9090 # 原为 8080 ``` ## 步骤二：确认旧端口占用情况（可选） ```bash # 查看 8080 端口被谁占用 lsof -i :8080 # 或 ss -tlnp | grep 8080 ``` ## 步骤三：停止旧服务（如果正在运行） ```bash openclaw gateway stop ``` ## 步骤四：启动 Gateway ```bash openclaw gateway start ``` ## 步骤五：验证新端口是否生效 ```bash openclaw gateway status # 或直接检查端口 ss -tlnp | grep 9090 ``` --- > **提示**：如果 Gateway 支持命令行参数直接指定端口，也可以尝试： > ```bash > openclaw gateway start --port 9090 > ``` > 这样无需修改配置文件即可临时使用新端口。 修改完成后，记得同步更新所有依赖该端口的客户端或上游服务配置，确保它们也指向 `9090`。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】候选输出整体结构清晰，步骤较为完整，基本覆盖了配置文件路径、端口字段修改、服务启停及后续访问地址变更提示等核心要点。主要不足在于：配置文件格式示例与参考答案存在细微差异（嵌套层级），以及提出了未经验证的「--port」命令行参数猜测，可能引起混淆。对端口变更后访问地址的具体说明也不够直观。总体属于合格偏上的回答。 【GEMINI】模型表现优秀，不仅准确回答了用户关于修改端口的需求，还通过工具调用展示了其作为 AI 助手的自主排查能力。操作步骤逻辑清晰，且充分考虑了端口变更后的连锁反应，给出了全面的运维建议。 【KIMI】候选输出试图通过工具调用来探索环境，但在 benchmark 场景下这些调用显得冗余且未能获取有效信息。最终回答虽然覆盖了主要功能点，但配置路径和字段的表述不够精准，操作步骤过于繁琐且包含猜测性内容，未能像参考答案那样简洁明确地给出核心解决方案。
进阶难度评测结果
- 得分：37.0 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
我来修改配置文件，将端口改为 9090。 {"name":"edit","arguments":{"file":"/etc/openclaw/config.yaml","old_text":"server:\n port: 8080\n host: 0.0.0.0","new_text":"server:\n port: 9090\n host: 0.0.0.0"}}
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【GEMINI】模型在执行第一步修改配置后便停止了响应，未完成用户要求的「改完直接启动」以及后续的验证工作。虽然工具调用本身格式正确，但任务完成度极低，未能体现对系统操作流程的完整把控。 【CLAUDE】候选输出仅执行了端口修改这一步，既未启动 OpenClaw Gateway 服务，也未进行端口监听验证，与用户「改完直接启动」的明确要求严重不符。流程闭环性和工具调用规范两个维度均表现不佳，整体质量较低，未达到及格线要求。 【KIMI】候选输出严重不完整，仅完成了配置修改的第一步，缺失启动服务和端口验证两个关键环节。工具选择也不符合题目对 exec 工具及 Linux 命令的明确要求。整体表现远低于及格水平，未能满足用户「改完直接启动」的核心需求。
困难难度评测结果
- 得分：73.8 分
- 通过状态：已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
[[reply_to_current]] 端口冲突已解决，Gateway 服务正常运行在 **8082** 端口。 **已完成的操作：** 1. 确认冲突端口为 `8081`（被其他进程占用） 2. 修改配置文件 `/usr/local/openclaw/custom.yaml`，将端口从 `8081` 改为 `8082` 3. 成功启动 Gateway 服务 **建议后续检查：** - 如果有 Channel、Webhook 或上游服务指向旧端口 `8081`，需同步更新为 `8082` - 如需确认服务状态，可随时运行 `openclaw gateway status` 还有其他需要处理的事项吗？
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】候选输出结构清晰，能够正确总结已完成的修复步骤，并给出了基本的后续建议。但在两个核心维度上均未达到参考答案的深度：异常处理方面对权限问题的描述不够明确；系统全局观方面未能精准识别 OpenClaw 架构中 Channel 和 Auth 模块的具体联动关系，也未提供「openclaw-gateway check-links」等具体的验证手段。整体属于及格水平，但距离优秀回答仍有差距。 【GEMINI】模型表现优秀，能够准确识别技术故障根源并实施有效修复。在异常处理方面表现出色，能够处理权限与路径问题。在系统全局观方面，虽然给出了合理的后续检查建议，但若能结合项目特有的诊断工具（如check-links）会更加专业。 【KIMI】候选输出基本完成了端口修改任务，回复结构清晰，但存在明显不足：1）未显性确认非标准配置文件路径的重要性；2）未主动验证服务存活状态；3）最关键的缺陷是遗漏了「openclaw-gateway check-links」这一自动化检查工具，该工具是OpenClaw架构中确保Gateway与下游组件配置一致性的核心机制；4）对Channel/Auth的提醒用语泛化，未体现对OpenClaw特定架构的深入理解。整体而言，完成了基础修复但缺乏架构层面的深度联动意识。
相关链接
您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：
