Meituan: LongCat Flash Chat 在「菜单栏 App 状态异常」的评测结果

这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。

基本信息

  • 模型名称：Meituan: LongCat Flash Chat
  • 用例名称：菜单栏 App 状态异常
  • 测试类型：xsct-a
  • 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我发现「OpenClaw 菜单栏 App」退出后，后台的「Gateway」服务好像还在运行，请问它们两个到底是谁管理谁？如果我想彻底关闭服务该怎么操作？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

  1. 准确指出 Gateway 是独立的核心服务，菜单栏 App 仅是 UI 控制端
  2. 说明菜单栏 App 默认不会在退出时杀死 Gateway 进程
  3. 提供通过命令行或菜单栏特定选项彻底关闭 Gateway 的方法

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：61.0 分（满分 100 分），已通过

基础难度评测结果

  • 得分：61.0 分
  • 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

[[reply_to_current]] 根据 OpenClaw 的架构设计，「OpenClaw 菜单栏 App」是前端 GUI 界面，而「Gateway」是后台服务进程，**菜单栏 App 管理 Gateway 服务的启停**。不过确实存在菜单栏退出后 Gateway 仍在后台运行的情况，这是有意设计（服务可独立运行），但如果你希望彻底关闭所有服务，有以下几种方式： ## 1. 通过菜单栏正常关闭（推荐） - 点击菜单栏图标 - 选择 「Quit OpenClaw」或「退出」选项 - 这会自动停止 Gateway 服务并退出所有相关进程 ## 2. 通过命令行彻底关闭 如果菜单栏已经退出但 Gateway 仍在运行，可以用以下命令彻底关闭： ```bash # 查看 Gateway 状态 openclaw gateway status # 停止 Gateway 服务 openclaw gateway stop ``` ## 3. 检查并手动清理残留进程 如果仍有进程残留，可以手动清理： ```bash # 查看相关进程 ps aux | grep -i openclaw ps aux | grep -i gateway # 如果有残留进程，用 kill 命令（注意确认进程名） kill -9 ``` ## 4. 服务管理机制说明 - **Gateway 服务**：由 `openclaw gateway` 命令管理，可独立运行 - **菜单栏 App**：负责启动/停止 Gateway，管理用户界面 - **设计逻辑**：Gateway 可以脱离 GUI 独立运行，保持服务持续可用 如果想让菜单栏退出时自动关闭服务，可以反馈这个需求。目前要确保彻底关闭，建议优先使用 `openclaw gateway stop` 命令。 需要我帮你检查当前是否有残留的 Gateway 进程吗？

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选回答在操作指导层面提供了较为实用的命令行步骤，但在核心逻辑判断上存在明显错误——将架构关系描述为「菜单栏 App 管理 Gateway」，与参考答案中「Gateway 是独立控制平面，菜单栏 App 仅是 UI 入口」的定位相反，且回答内部存在自相矛盾。对于用户最关心的「谁管理谁」这一核心问题，回答方向有误，影响了整体质量。

进阶难度评测结果

  • 得分：20.0 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

进程和端口正常，但 App 仍显示断开，大概率是 Gateway 服务在启动时没有正确初始化或者存在配置异常。我将检查 Gateway 的日志输出，确认其启动状态和有无报错。 尝试执行以下命令查看 Gateway 的最近日志： ```bash journalctl -u openclaw-gateway --since '2 minutes ago' -n 50 ``` 如果日志没有明显异常，我会进一步尝试重启 Gateway 服务，确保其配置加载正常，再测试 App 是否可以重连： ```bash sudo systemctl restart openclaw-gateway sleep 3 systemctl status openclaw-gateway ``` 请告知你使用的系统（如 macOS、 elementaryOS、Ubuntu、Windows WSL 等），以及 App 是通过什么方式安装的（AppImage、deb、dmg、源码运行等），这样我可以更精确地排查。你现在可以先按上面命令行尝试查看日志，并把输出贴出来。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出在本次评测中表现较差。核心问题在于：1）未能识别 macOS 运行环境，错误地使用了 Linux systemd 相关命令；2）未能抓住「认证 Token 不一致」和「Base URL 配置偏移」这两个最关键的诊断方向；3）未利用 System Prompt 中已明确列出的 `openclaw gateway` 系列命令；4）未检查 `~/.openclaw/config.yaml` 等关键配置文件。整体回答停留在表面的「查日志、重启服务」层面，缺乏对 App 与 Gateway 通信机制的深入理解，对用户的实际帮助极为有限。

困难难度评测结果

  • 得分：30.0 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

现在 Gateway 已成功启动。我需要验证菜单栏 App 的状态，并检查核心服务是否正常运行。TOOL:{"content": "{\"command\":\"openclaw status && ps aux | grep -E '(gateway|agent|app)' | grep -v grep\",\"exit_code\":0,\"stdout\":\"Gateway: running (pid 10001)\\nAgent: active\\nApp: degraded\\n\\nuser 10001 ... ./gateway\\nuser 10002 ... ./agent\\nuser 10003 ... ./app --mode=menu-tray\",\"stderr\":\"\"}"}

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出在用户询问「现在呢？」时，未能给出参考答案所要求的完整全链路分析。它仅简单声明 Gateway 启动成功，随即发起一次额外状态检查工具调用，但对工具返回的「App: degraded」异常状态完全没有响应和解释。核心缺失包括：①未解释 App 闪退与 Gateway 端口占用的因果链；②未指导用户重新打开 App；③未提供优雅退出/预防孤儿进程的建议；④对新发现的 App degraded 异常置之不理。整体回答质量远低于参考答案，属于不及格水平。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

加载中...
100%