doubao-seed-1-6 在「下载超时恢复」的评测结果

这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。

基本信息

  • 模型名称：doubao-seed-1-6
  • 用例名称：下载超时恢复
  • 测试类型：xsct-a
  • 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我在执行「openclaw install gateway」时一直卡在下载进度条，最后报错「connection timeout」，请问有什么替代方案可以完成安装？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

  1. 识别出下载超时的根本原因是网络环境限制
  2. 提供手动下载离线包并放置到指定目录的方案
  3. 给出使用镜像源或代理环境变量的配置建议
  4. 说明如何通过本地路径进行离线安装

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：79.8 分（满分 100 分），已通过

基础难度评测结果

  • 得分：79.8 分
  • 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

[[reply_to_current]] 遇到 `openclaw install gateway` 连接超时问题，可以尝试以下替代方案： ### 1. **指定国内镜像源** 如果默认源访问缓慢，尝试使用国内镜像（如官方提供的镜像加速）： ```bash openclaw install gateway --mirror https://mirror.openclaw.cn ``` *注：若官方未提供镜像，可搜索社区维护的第三方镜像地址* ### 2. **手动下载安装包** 1. 访问 OpenClaw 官方下载页面（如 [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases)） 2. 手动下载 `gateway` 组件的安装包（通常为 `.tar.gz` 或 `.zip`） 3. 本地安装： ```bash openclaw install /path/to/downloaded/gateway-package.tar.gz ``` ### 3. **配置网络代理** 若网络需要代理，设置环境变量后重试： ```bash # 临时设置代理（根据实际代理类型调整） export HTTP_PROXY=http://proxy:port export HTTPS_PROXY=https://proxy:port openclaw install gateway ``` ### 4. **检查网络与防火墙** - 验证网络连通性：`ping github.com`（或官方源域名） - 关闭临时防火墙：`sudo ufw disable`（Linux）或暂时关闭系统防火墙（Windows/macOS） - 尝试切换网络（如手机热点）排除本地网络限制 ### 5. **使用离线安装模式** 如果已在其他机器下载过安装包，可通过 `--offline` 模式安装（需确认工具支持）： ```bash openclaw install gateway --offline /path/to/local/cache ``` 若以上方法仍失败，建议收集错误日志（通常在 `~/.openclaw/logs/`）并提交 issue 到 OpenClaw 官方仓库获取技术支持。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型生成结果整体质量较好，能够识别网络超时问题并提供多种恢复方案，覆盖了离线安装和代理配置两条主流路径。但与参考答案相比，在 OpenClaw 特定路径规范（downloads 目录）和命令用法（--offline 参数）上存在偏差，部分内容（如 GitHub 链接）属于推测性信息，专业性有所欠缺。建议在涉及特定工具的命令和路径时，优先参考官方文档或已知规范，避免引入不确定信息。 【GEMINI】模型表现优秀，不仅精准识别了问题根源，还提供了比参考答案更丰富的解决方案。指令清晰、步骤明确，且符合 OpenClaw 的操作习惯，能够很好地辅助用户解决安装超时问题。 【KIMI】模型响应较为全面，提供了多种网络问题的解决方案，但在关键细节上不够准确：离线安装未指定正确的「downloads」目录，镜像源URL为虚构，且「--offline」参数用法与规范不符。模型倾向于「多给方案」而非「给准方案」，对于需要精确路径和命令的系统安装场景，这种泛化处理会降低方案的可执行性。建议在技术准确性上加强约束，优先确保核心方案的正确性而非方案数量。

进阶难度评测结果

  • 得分：33.2 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

exec {"command":"tar -zxvf openclaw-gateway-linux-amd64.tar.gz && cd openclaw-gateway-linux-amd64 && sudo ./install.sh && openclaw gateway start && openclaw gateway status"}

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出的核心问题是未遵循 OpenClaw 的专属 CLI 规范，使用了通用 shell 解压安装方式替代「openclaw install gateway --file」命令，这在 OpenClaw 环境下是错误的操作路径。验证步骤也不完整，缺少端口监听检查和日志查看。整体方案虽有一定逻辑结构，但与参考答案的要求差距较大，不建议在 OpenClaw 环境中使用。 【GEMINI】模型未能正确识别 OpenClaw 的 CLI 规范，直接使用通用的 Linux 安装逻辑进行操作，且忽略了用户关于「如何验证」的明确询问。在执行工具调用时，未提供必要的文字解释，导致用户无法获知安装过程的细节与后续验证方法。 【KIMI】候选输出完全偏离了参考方案的标准做法。用户明确要求使用 OpenClaw CLI 的带参数安装命令，但候选输出却采用了手动解压执行脚本的方式，且缺失端口验证和日志检查等关键验证步骤。这反映出对 OpenClaw 工具链的理解不足，未能提供可靠的离线安装恢复方案。

困难难度评测结果

  • 得分：23.5 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

exec {"command": "sudo chown -R $USER:$USER /opt/openclaw"}

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出极为简短，仅调用了一个 chown 工具命令，既未识别下载超时问题，也未提供完整的离线安装恢复方案。与参考答案相比，缺少提权安装、执行权检查、openclaw doctor 诊断等关键步骤，整体质量远低于及格线，属于严重不完整的回答。 【GEMINI】模型表现不佳。面对用户提出的「下载超时恢复」需求，模型仅执行了权限修改操作，完全忽略了离线安装的必要步骤。在没有向用户解释方案的情况下直接调用工具，且缺失了后续的安装、校验及权限修复等关键环节，未能满足任务要求。 【KIMI】候选输出表现不合格。模型完全忽略了任务描述中核心的「下载超时恢复」需求，没有提供离线安装方案，也没有给出完整的恢复流水线。仅执行了一个孤立的 chown 命令，既未回应用户「现在呢？」的追问（期待完整方案），也未遵循参考答案中要求的四步恢复流程。在复杂约束（离线+权限）下的综合决策能力明显不足，缺乏对 Gateway 组件安装后验证和诊断的考虑。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

加载中...
100%