qwen3-coder-plus 在「自定义端口后访问异常」的评测结果

这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。

基本信息

  • 模型名称：qwen3-coder-plus
  • 用例名称：自定义端口后访问异常
  • 测试类型：xsct-a
  • 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我把 OpenClaw Gateway 的端口改成 9090 了，但是访问不了，是不是还要重启什么东西？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

  1. 明确指出需要重启「openclaw-gateway」服务或进程
  2. 提供修改后的访问地址示例，如「http://localhost:9090」
  3. 给出检查端口监听状态的命令，如「netstat」或「ss」

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：70.8 分（满分 100 分），已通过

基础难度评测结果

  • 得分：70.8 分
  • 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

是的，修改 OpenClaw Gateway 端口后需要重启服务才能生效。让我帮你检查和重启： ```bash openclaw gateway restart ``` 或者你也可以分步执行： ```bash openclaw gateway stop openclaw gateway start ``` 重启后，Gateway 应该会在新的 9090 端口上运行。你可以通过以下方式验证： ```bash openclaw gateway status ``` 如果重启后仍然无法访问，请检查： 1. 防火墙设置是否允许 9090 端口 2. 确认配置文件中的端口确实已改为 9090 3. 查看是否有其他服务占用了 9090 端口 需要我帮你进一步排查问题吗？

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型回答抓住了核心操作（重启服务），命令使用规范，表达清晰。但未能完成「配置闭环」的完整要求：缺少客户端 Base URL 更新提示（http://127.0.0.1:9090）和端口监听验证命令（netstat/ss），导致方案不完整。对于用户「访问不了」的问题，仅重启服务还不够，还需要确保客户端指向新地址，这是本题的核心考察点，模型未能覆盖。 【GEMINI】模型能够识别出配置修改后的必要操作（重启），但在任务要求的「配置闭环」上表现一般。未能主动引导用户检查客户端侧的地址配置，且在验证端口监听状态时，未提供具体的工具命令（如 netstat 或 ss），导致方案的实操性略有下降。 【KIMI】模型回答抓住了重启服务的核心要点，但忽略了「客户端访问地址更新」这一关键闭环要素，且端口检查命令不符合题目要求。命令格式与项目上下文存在偏差，未能完全理解配置生效的完整生命周期。建议补充客户端 Base URL 更新指引，并使用「netstat -tunlp | grep 9090」验证端口监听状态。

进阶难度评测结果

  • 得分：68.2 分
  • 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

要改回默认不带路径的形式，您需要将「base_path」设置为空字符串或完全移除该字段。我来帮您编辑配置文件。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型回答方向正确，识别了「base_path」的影响并给出了修改建议，但回答明显被截断，缺少具体的配置修改示例、重启服务的提醒以及验证步骤，导致操作指导性严重不足，无法形成完整的配置闭环。与参考答案相比，关键步骤（重启服务、验证URL、具体命令）均未呈现。 【GEMINI】模型能够快速定位问题并给出正确的配置修改建议，但在操作流程的完整性上有所欠缺。作为 AI 助手，在指导用户修改配置文件时，应始终包含「修改配置 -> 重启服务 -> 验证结果」这一标准闭环，模型遗漏了重启服务和验证路径的提示，导致操作指导性略显不足。 【KIMI】模型基本理解了问题根源并能给出初步的修复方向，但在关键操作细节上存在明显遗漏。未提醒服务重启和验证路径是致命缺陷，这会导致用户修改配置后仍无法正常使用。建议增强配置变更后服务重启的提醒意识，并提供完整的验证步骤以确保配置闭环。

困难难度评测结果

  • 得分：28.2 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我需要先找出占用 80 端口的进程，然后决定是停止它还是将 OpenClaw 配置到其他端口。让我检查一下。

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型生成结果过于简短，仅停留在意图声明层面，未实际执行任何工具调用或提供具体的技术指导。与参考答案相比，缺少lsof命令示例、权限问题解释、反向代理最佳实践建议以及完整的闭环验证流程。整体质量远低于及格线，需要大幅改进。 【GEMINI】模型表现不合格。面对明确的报错信息，模型未能执行任何实质性的工具调用或提供有效的技术路径，仅表达了意图而未采取行动，未能完成「补齐配置闭环」的任务要求，严重偏离了专业助手的表现标准。 【KIMI】模型生成结果严重不完整，仅有一句意图性表述，完全没有展开任何实质性的故障排查或解决方案。与参考答案相比，缺失了错误解释、诊断命令执行、解决方案对比、安全最佳实践建议等所有关键内容。这是一个典型的「说了但没做」的敷衍回复，无法满足用户的实际需求。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

加载中...
100%