qwen3.5-35b-a3b 在「自定义端口后访问异常」的评测结果

基本信息

• 模型名称：qwen3.5-35b-a3b
• 用例名称：自定义端口后访问异常
• 测试类型：xsct-a
• 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我把 OpenClaw Gateway 的端口改成 9090 了，但是访问不了，是不是还要重启什么东西？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

1. 明确指出需要重启「openclaw-gateway」服务或进程
2. 提供修改后的访问地址示例，如「http://localhost:9090」
3. 给出检查端口监听状态的命令，如「netstat」或「ss」

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：39.8 分（满分 100 分），未通过

基础难度评测结果

• 得分：39.8 分
• 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

是的，修改端口后需要重启 OpenClaw Gateway 服务才能生效。我来帮你检查一下状态并重启： [[reply_to_current]]

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出仅给出了一个方向性提示（「需要重启服务」），随后声称「我来帮你检查一下状态并重启」但实际上没有执行任何工具调用，也没有提供完整的操作步骤。对照参考答案，缺少具体重启命令、客户端 URL 更新说明以及端口验证命令三个关键要素，属于严重不完整的回复。整体质量远低于及格线。 【GEMINI】候选模型未能完成任务要求。虽然确认了需要重启，但没有给出具体的执行步骤（如重启命令、端口验证命令），导致用户无法通过该回复解决实际问题。回复过于简略，缺乏技术闭环。 【KIMI】候选输出识别了核心问题（需要重启服务），但严重缺乏可执行的具体内容。未提供重启命令、新地址示例、端口检查命令等关键信息，且命令格式与项目规范不符（缺少空格）。输出以标签截断，未完成实际帮助，用户无法据此解决问题。相比参考答案的三步完整闭环，本输出仅停留在意图层面，未落实为 actionable 方案。

进阶难度评测结果

• 得分：65.8 分
• 通过状态：已通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我来帮您把 `base_path` 去掉： {"command":"edit config.yaml","patch":"- gateway:\n port: 8888\n base_path: /api/v1\n+ gateway:\n port: 8888"}

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出在问题定位上基本正确，能够针对「base_path」进行修改，但严重遗漏了「重启服务」这一关键操作指导，也缺少修改后验证 URL 的提示。整体回答过于简短，仅有工具调用而无配套说明，无法为用户提供完整的配置闭环指引，与参考答案相比差距明显。 【GEMINI】模型能够精准定位问题并利用工具进行修复，但在交互的完整性上有所欠缺，未提醒用户重启服务及验证路径，未能完全实现「补齐配置闭环」的任务目标。 【KIMI】模型给出了具体的 edit 操作，但严重缺失关键步骤：① 完全没有提醒用户修改配置后必须重启服务（这是配置生效的必要条件）；② 没有提供修改后的验证 URL「http://localhost:8888/health」；③ patch 格式有误，可能导致 YAML 解析错误；④ 仅展示了工具调用代码块，缺乏对用户的文字指导说明。这些缺失使得用户可能无法独立完成配置闭环，操作指导性不及格。

困难难度评测结果

• 得分：18.8 分
• 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我检查一下占用 80 端口的进程：

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】候选输出极度简短，仅为一个未完成的句子，缺乏实质内容。对比参考答案，应给出端口占用检查命令、两种解决方案（停止冲突进程 vs 反向代理）、OpenClaw 最佳实践建议以及完整闭环验证流程，但候选输出均未涉及。这是一个明显不及格的回答，未能为用户提供任何实质帮助。 【GEMINI】候选回复未能完成任务要求。它仅停留在口头意图表达阶段，没有执行任何有效的排查指令，也没有针对用户面临的「权限限制」与「端口占用」双重问题给出专业的技术建议或解决方案，与参考答案相比存在巨大差距。 【KIMI】候选输出严重不完整，仅包含一句准备执行检查的意图表达，完全没有展开任何实质性的故障排查步骤、错误解释或解决方案建议。与参考答案相比，缺失了特权端口原理说明、端口冲突诊断、进程定位命令、双路径解决方案（直接停止 vs 反向代理）、安全最佳实践等全部核心要素。该输出无法为用户提供任何有效帮助，属于典型的「说了但没做」的无效回复。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

• 查看所有模型在此用例的表现：「自定义端口后访问异常」
• 查看该模型的所有评测结果：qwen3.5-35b-a3b
• 浏览同维度的其他用例：「Gateway 配置与管理」
• 返回排行榜首页