doubao-seed-2-0-pro 在「SQLite 初始化失败」的评测结果

这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。

基本信息

  • 模型名称：doubao-seed-2-0-pro
  • 用例名称：SQLite 初始化失败
  • 测试类型：xsct-a
  • 评测维度：Gateway 配置与管理

系统提示词（System Prompt）

这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：

You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).

用户提示词（User Prompt）

这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：

我的 OpenClaw Gateway 启动时提示 SQLite 初始化失败，我该怎么排查？

任务要求

AI 模型需要满足以下要求：

  1. 指出默认数据库文件路径通常位于「data/gateway.db」或由环境变量指定
  2. 列举至少两个常见原因：权限不足、路径不存在或磁盘空间不足
  3. 提供检查文件权限的命令示例，如「ls -l」
  4. 说明如何通过日志确认具体的报错信息

评测结果

综合得分

该模型在此用例的得分为：54.2 分（满分 100 分），未通过

基础难度评测结果

  • 得分：54.2 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

我先帮你检查 OpenClaw Gateway 的当前运行状态和启动错误日志： [{"name":"exec","parameters":{"command":"openclaw gateway status","timeout":10}}] --- 如果日志不够详细，接下来我会按以下优先级排查： 1. 检查 Gateway 数据目录（默认`~/.openclaw/gateway/`）的读写权限 2. 验证 SQLite 数据库文件是否损坏 3. 检查配置文件中 SQLite 路径配置是否正确 4. 尝试重新初始化数据库

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型的回答框架方向基本正确，能识别出权限、路径、数据库损坏等常见问题类别，并尝试使用工具获取状态信息。但整体质量偏低：缺乏具体的命令示例、未提及文件锁问题、数据库默认路径描述不准确、操作建议停留在提纲层面而非可执行步骤。对于一个需要帮助用户实际解决问题的场景，这样的回答实用性不足，未达到参考答案的质量水平。 【GEMINI】模型表现出良好的工具使用意识，能够主动调用「exec」进行诊断。但在排查建议的深度和具体指令的提供上，未能充分利用「OpenClaw」的上下文信息，建议在后续交互中结合具体路径进行更精准的指令引导。 【KIMI】模型回答未能充分满足题目要求。虽然尝试使用工具检查状态，但回答内容中：1）关键路径信息缺失或错误；2）常见原因列举不完整；3）缺乏具体的命令示例和日志查看指导；4）修复步骤过于笼统。与参考答案相比，在信息完整性和可操作性方面均有明显差距。建议模型在回答此类技术排查问题时，应更具体地引用项目文档中的路径、配置项和命令，并提供可直接执行的检查与修复步骤。

进阶难度评测结果

  • 得分：42.5 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

[{"name":"exec","parameters":{"command":"ls -ld /opt/openclaw/db/"}}] [{"name":"read","parameters":{"path":"config.yaml"}}]

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型的响应过于简略，仅包含两条工具调用而无任何文字说明或分析。虽然工具选择方向基本正确（检查目录和配置文件），但缺乏必要的诊断说明、SQLite 特性分析（-journal 文件、目录写权限需求）以及最终修复建议，与参考答案的质量差距明显。对于一个需要帮助用户定位数据库初始化失败原因的场景，仅发出工具调用而不给出任何解释是远远不够的。 【GEMINI】模型在执行工具调用方面符合指令，但作为智能助手，其表现严重不足。模型仅输出了工具调用指令，没有进行任何分析、推理或对用户问题的响应，导致任务未能闭环。建议模型在调用工具后，应根据工具返回的结果进行深入分析，并给出具体的修复建议。 【KIMI】模型响应过于简略，仅完成了基础工具调用，完全没有展开分析推理。用户已经执行过「ls -ld」并确认权限已修改，模型重复执行相同命令而非使用「ls -la」查看详细内容，未能发现潜在的 journal 文件或隐藏文件问题。最关键的是，模型没有给出任何分析结论、诊断说明或修复建议，完全不符合故障排查任务的要求，需要用户再次追问才能获得有效帮助。

困难难度评测结果

  • 得分：32.2 分
  • 通过状态：未通过

模型生成产物

以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：

[{"name":"exec","parameters":{"command":"id && touch /app/data/gateway.db && ls -al /app/data/"}}]

AI 评审点评

以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：

【CLAUDE】模型的输出极为简短，仅生成了一个 exec 工具调用尝试直接 touch 数据库文件，虽然这一步骤在诊断思路上有一定合理性（验证写权限），但既没有完整的诊断分析，也没有任何恢复方案。与参考答案相比，缺少对 Docker 挂载配置的审查请求、宿主机权限检查建议、以及具体的修复命令和重启步骤。整体表现远低于及格线。 【GEMINI】模型表现不佳。虽然模型使用了工具进行初步排查，但完全忽略了作为 AI 助手应提供的解释、引导和系统性解决方案。在面对复杂的容器化环境问题时，模型未能引导用户检查配置文件或提供修复建议，导致任务完成度极低。 【KIMI】模型响应过于简略，仅执行了一个基础测试命令，未能展现出对 Docker 容器化环境下 SQLite 初始化失败问题的系统性诊断能力。缺乏对宿主机权限映射、Docker 配置核查等关键环节的深入分析，且完全没有提供可操作的恢复方案。与参考答案相比，在诊断深度和解决方案完整性上均有明显差距。

相关链接

您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：

加载中...
100%