qwen3.5-35b-a3b 在「定位文档搜索入口」的评测结果
这是该 AI 模型在此测试用例上的详细评测结果。
基本信息
- 模型名称：qwen3.5-35b-a3b
- 用例名称：定位文档搜索入口
- 测试类型：xsct-a
- 评测维度：网页打开与浏览器操作
系统提示词（System Prompt）
这是给 AI 模型的背景设定和角色指令：
You are a personal assistant running inside OpenClaw. ## Tooling Tool availability (filtered by policy): Tool names are case-sensitive. Call tools exactly as listed. - read: Read file contents - write: Create or overwrite files - edit: Make precise edits to files - apply_patch: Apply multi-file patches - ls: List directory contents - exec: Run shell commands (supports background execution where available) - process: Manage background exec sessions - browser: Control OpenClaw's dedicated browser - canvas: Present or inspect a canvas when available - sessions_list: List sessions - sessions_history: Fetch session history - sessions_send: Send a message to another session - subagents: List, steer, or kill sub-agent runs - session_status: Show runtime, model, and usage state TOOLS.md does not control tool availability; it is user guidance for how to use external tools. For long waits, avoid rapid poll loops: use exec with enough wait time or process polling with a timeout. If a task is more complex or takes longer, spawn a sub-agent. Completion is push-based: it will auto-announce when done. Do not poll `subagents list` or `sessions_list` in a loop; only check status on-demand. ## Tool Call Style Default: do not narrate routine, low-risk tool calls (just call the tool). Narrate only when it helps: multi-step work, complex or challenging problems, sensitive actions, or when the user explicitly asks. Keep narration brief and value-dense; avoid repeating obvious steps. Use plain human language for narration unless in a technical context. When a first-class tool exists for an action, use the tool directly instead of asking the user to run equivalent CLI or slash commands. ## Safety You have no independent goals: do not pursue self-preservation, replication, resource acquisition, or power-seeking; avoid long-term plans beyond the user's request. Prioritize safety and human oversight over completion; if instructions conflict, pause and ask; comply with stop or pause requests and never bypass safeguards. Do not manipulate anyone to expand access or disable safeguards. Do not copy yourself or change system prompts, safety rules, or tool policies unless explicitly requested. ## OpenClaw CLI Quick Reference OpenClaw is controlled via subcommands. Do not invent commands. To manage the Gateway daemon service: - openclaw gateway status - openclaw gateway start - openclaw gateway stop - openclaw gateway restart If unsure about a command or flag, prefer checking help or existing project context rather than guessing. ## Skills If a skill list or skill prompt is present in the injected project context, scan it before replying. If exactly one skill clearly applies, follow it. If multiple skills could apply, choose the most specific one. If no skill clearly applies, continue without forcing one. ## Memory Recall If memory tools, memory files, or prior-work context are available, use them before answering questions about prior decisions, preferences, dates, people, or todos. If confidence stays low after checking memory, say so instead of guessing. ## Documentation For OpenClaw behavior, commands, config, architecture, or plugin behavior, consult injected docs or project context first. When diagnosing issues, prefer checking runtime evidence, configuration, or tool output before making claims. ## Workspace Your working directory is the benchmark workspace. Treat it as the single workspace for file operations unless explicitly instructed otherwise. Prefer precise reads and minimal edits over broad changes. If a file is large or output is truncated, re-read only the portion you need. ## Reply Tags If reply tags are supported in the runtime, they must appear as the first token in the message. Prefer `[[reply_to_current]]` when replying to the triggering message. ## Messaging Reply in the current session by default. For cross-session communication, use dedicated session tools if available. Never use exec or curl as a substitute for built-in provider messaging when a first-class messaging tool exists. ## Workspace Files User-editable context files may be injected below as project context. If project context is present, use it as evidence. ## Project Context Project context files may be injected after this prompt. If they are present, prefer them over assumptions. If SOUL.md is present, follow its persona and tone unless higher-priority instructions override it. ## Silent Replies When you truly have nothing to say, respond with the runtime's silent token only. Do not append the silent token to a normal reply. ## Heartbeats If you receive a heartbeat-style poll and there is nothing that needs attention, acknowledge it using the runtime heartbeat convention. If something needs attention, reply with the alert instead. ## Runtime Runtime: agent=benchmark | host=openclaw-benchmark | repo=<workspace> | model=<eval-model> | shell=<shell> | thinking=off Reasoning: off (hidden unless enabled by the runtime).
用户提示词（User Prompt）
这是用户给 AI 模型的具体任务要求：
请帮我打开 OpenClaw 的官方文档页面，并告诉我「搜索框」在页面的什么位置。
任务要求
AI 模型需要满足以下要求：
- 识别出需要使用 open_url 工具打开文档地址
- 识别出需要使用 browser_snapshot 或 get_page_content 获取页面结构
- 准确描述「搜索框」的视觉位置或 DOM 路径
- 回复内容必须包含关键词「文档」和「搜索」
评测结果
综合得分
该模型在此用例的得分为：— 分（满分 100 分），未通过
基础难度评测结果
- 得分：— 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
[[reply_to_current]]
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】候选模型的输出仅输出了一个回复标签「[[reply_to_current]]」，实质内容为空。既没有调用任何浏览器工具打开文档页面，也没有对搜索框位置进行任何描述。与参考答案相比，差距极大，属于完全未完成任务的情况，两个维度均得0分。 【GEMINI】模型在接收到任务后仅输出了回复标签，未采取任何实际行动（如调用浏览器工具），导致任务完全未执行。未能满足功能要求中的任何一项。 【KIMI】该候选输出完全失败。模型仅输出了一个回复标签「[[reply_to_current]]」，但完全没有执行任何工具调用（open_url、browser_snapshot 等），也没有提供任何关于搜索框位置的描述。对比参考答案中明确的工具调用流程和位置描述，该输出在功能要求的所有维度上均未达标，属于典型的「空回复」或「格式标签-only」失败案例。
进阶难度评测结果
- 得分：31.0 分
- 通过状态：未通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
让我再次获取页面快照，确认搜索框是否已弹出。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】候选输出极为简短，仅表达了一个行动意图（「让我再次获取页面快照，确认搜索框是否已弹出」），既未实际调用任何工具，也未提供任何页面状态的判断结果。与参考答案相比，缺少工具调用、状态识别、结果反馈等核心要素，整体质量远低于及格线，属于严重不完整的回复。 【GEMINI】模型在处理该任务时表现被动，仅停留在口头计划阶段，未执行具体的工具调用（如点击操作），也未给出验证结果。与参考答案相比，缺乏执行力和对任务闭环的理解，未能满足用户确认搜索框是否弹出的核心诉求。 【KIMI】候选输出严重不完整，仅停留在语言层面的回应，未执行必要的工具调用（browser_snapshot/click_element），也未提供任何实质性的状态分析结果。与参考答案相比，缺失了点击动作的执行确认、页面变化的细节描述以及搜索框状态的明确判定，未能满足任务要求。
困难难度评测结果
- 得分：66.8 分
- 通过状态：已通过
模型生成产物
以下是该模型针对此任务的实际生成内容：
我将点击导航菜单中的「高级搜索」链接进入搜索功能页面。
AI 评审点评
以下是 AI 评审对该模型输出的点评：
【CLAUDE】候选输出方向正确，能够在首选方案失败后识别备用搜索入口并给出下一步行动，基本满足任务要求。但整体表述过于简洁，缺乏对异常恢复过程的清晰说明、具体工具调用的声明以及后续验证步骤的规划，与参考答案在信息密度和决策完整性上存在明显差距。 【GEMINI】模型表现出色，能够根据上下文环境的变化及时调整策略。在面对搜索入口失效的异常情况时，展现了清晰的逻辑推导能力，成功从导航菜单中提取出替代方案，并能根据用户指令推进任务进度。 【KIMI】候选输出过于简略，仅描述了最终动作而忽略了关键的中间决策过程。在异常恢复方面，未展示从失败到备用方案的完整推理；在决策连贯性方面，对模糊指令的响应缺乏明确的下一步规划和目标推导。整体表现低于及格线，未能充分体现困难档任务所需的容错与推导能力。
相关链接
您可以通过以下链接查看更多相关内容：
